RSS
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Outboard. Tampilkan semua postingan
Tampilkan postingan dengan label Outboard. Tampilkan semua postingan

EDENSOR; Desa Wisata Dalam Dongeng di Dunia Nyata

The small estate village of Edensor, pronounced ‘Ensor’, is set in one of the most beautiful locations in the country in parkland owned by the Devonshire family, whose stately home at Chatsworth House is only five minutes walk away. Mentioned in the Domesday Book, the village has been re-sited since then. Originally it lay between the river and the road through the Park, when the houses were set out in a straggling line down to the Derwent.

This did not appeal to the fourth Duke of Devonshire who having spent considerable money and effort improving the House, redesigning the gardens and building a grand new bridge over the river, decided to take down those houses visible from the House. The tenants were re-housed in the nearby estate villages of Pilsley and Beeley. The sixth Duke completed the dismantling of the old village and built the present one.

One house and garden on the riverside of the road, surrounded by a stone wall, still remains. Spared it is believed, because the tenant, an elderly man, did not want to move and the duke in an act of kindness allowed him to stay. Under the brow of the hill it was not visible from the House.

Joseph Paxton, who remodelled and landscaped the gardens at Chatsworth, chose the site for the new village, but it was John Robertson a relatively unknown architect from Derby who provided the designs. At that time aspiring young architects such as Robertson would prepare a book of house plans as part of their training.

It is thought that Robertson approached the Duke to show him the plans when he was busy with other matters and that after quickly looking through them he could not make up his mind and chose all the different styles in the book. The designs ranging from Norman to Jacobean, Swiss-style to Italian villas are all here at Edensor. A few of the old houses remained virtually untouched including parts of the old vicarage, two cottages overlooking the green and the old farmhouse which now houses the post office, shop and tea rooms.

Robertson retained the 14th century church, but only about 30 years after the completion of the model village it was replaced by a much larger one built by George Gilbert Scott. The new church with its graceful spire and spacious layout added to the status and importance of the village. A more recent addition that helps make the village more complete is the green, added in 1948 after the demolition of the school.

St Peter’s Church contains one of the finest monuments in the county. This commemorates Henry and William Cavendish, the sons of Bess of Hardwick, the latter son being the First Earl. In the chancel is a brass plaque which records the death of John Beaton, the loyal servant of Mary, Queen of Scots who was imprisoned at Chatsworth House during part of her period in captivity. Also in the church, in a glass case is a wreath of everlasting flowers sent by Queen Victoria to the funeral of Lord Frederick Cavendish, tragically killed in Ireland while on a peace mission. Joseph Paxton is buried in the churchyard in a grave of much grander scale than that of his master, the sixth Duke.

At the top of the churchyard is the grave of Kathleen Kennedy, the sister of the late President of the USA. She was the wife of the present Duke’s elder brother and heir to the Dukedom who was tragically killed in Belgium during the last war. Only four years later his wife was killed in an air crash.

In June, 1963, John F Kennedy, the President of the United States visited the grave -- five months before being assassinated – on the way by helicopter to a meeting with the Prime Minister. This event is recalled by the Duchess of Devonshire in her book, ‘The House: a Portrait of Chatsworth’, when she describes the reaction of one resident of the village, ‘The wind from that machine blew my chickens away, and I haven’t seen them since’.


The architect, Sir Jeffery Wyatville was employed in designing the two gate lodges; one an Italianate villa, the other in complete contrast an English Lodge to mark the entrance to the park. Through the park gates on the right the lane in the village forks; Edensor Lane bearing right and Japp lane to the left. The old coach house and stables have been converted into comfortable flats for retired employees.


Edensor House, occupied for a time by the present Duke and Duchess, has been used to entertain royalty. Outside the park gates the handsome brick building was formerly an inn to serve travellers; villagers had to be content with a makeshift alehouse in one of the cottages. This inn later became Chatsworth Institute and is now occupied by Chatsworth Estate Offices in front is a bowling green and to the side a golf course. The old alehouse cottage still exists, as do the iron staples from where the inn sign hung.


READ MORE -

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

OSAMA Bin Laden Is Dead

Osama bin Laden, the mastermind of the most devastating attack on American soil in modern times and the most hunted man in the world, was killed in a firefight with United States forces in Pakistan on Sunday, President Obama announced.

In a dramatic late-night appearance in the East Room of the White House, Mr. Obama declared that “justice has been done” as he disclosed that American military and C.I.A. operatives had finally cornered Bin Laden, the Al Qaeda leader who had eluded them for nearly a decade. American officials said Bin Laden resisted and was shot in the head. He was later buried at sea.

The news touched off an extraordinary outpouring of emotion as crowds gathered outside the White House, in Times Square and at the Ground Zero site, waving American flags, cheering, shouting, laughing and chanting, “U.S.A., U.S.A.!” In New York City, crowds sang “The Star-Spangled Banner.” Throughout downtown Washington, drivers honked horns deep into the night.

“For over two decades, Bin Laden has been Al Qaeda’s leader and symbol,” the president said in a statement televised around the world. “The death of Bin Laden marks the most significant achievement to date in our nation’s effort to defeat Al Qaeda. But his death does not mark the end of our effort. There’s no doubt that Al Qaeda will continue to pursue attacks against us. We must and we will remain vigilant at home and abroad.”

Bin Laden’s demise is a defining moment in the American-led fight against terrorism, a symbolic stroke affirming the relentlessness of the pursuit of those who attacked New York and Washington on Sept. 11, 2001. What remains to be seen, however, is whether it galvanizes Bin Laden’s followers by turning him into a martyr or serves as a turning of the page in the war in Afghanistan and gives further impetus to Mr. Obama to bring American troops home.

How much his death will affect Al Qaeda itself remains unclear. For years, as they failed to find him, American leaders have said that he was more symbolically important than operationally significant because he was on the run and hindered in any meaningful leadership role. And yet, he remained the most potent face of terrorism around the world and some of those who played down his role in recent years nonetheless celebrated his death.

Given Bin Laden’s status among radicals, the American government braced for possible retaliation. A senior Pentagon official said late Sunday that military bases in the United States and around the world were ordered to a higher state of readiness. The State Department issued a worldwide travel warning, urging Americans in volatile areas “to limit their travel outside of their homes and hotels and avoid mass gatherings and demonstrations.”

The strike could exacerbate deep tensions with Pakistan, which has periodically bristled at American counterterrorism efforts even as Bin Laden evidently found safe refuge on its territory for nearly a decade. Since taking office, Mr. Obama has ordered significantly more drone strikes on suspected terrorist targets in Pakistan, stirring public anger there and prompting the Pakistani government to protest.

When the end came for Bin Laden, he was found not in the remote tribal areas along the Pakistani-Afghan border where he has long been presumed to be sheltered, but in a massive compound about an hour’s drive north from the Pakistani capital of Islamabad. He was hiding in the medium-sized city of Abbottabad, home to a large Pakistani military base and a military academy of the Pakistani Army.

The house at the end of a narrow dirt road was roughly eight times larger than other homes in the area, but had no telephone or Internet connections. When American operatives converged on the house on Sunday, Bin Laden “resisted the assault force” and was killed in the middle of an intense gun battle, a senior administration official said, but details were still sketchy early Monday morning.

The official said that military and intelligence officials first learned last summer that a “high-value target” was being protected in the compound and began working on a plan for going in to get him. Beginning in March, Mr. Obama presided over five national security meetings at the White House to go over plans for the operation and on Friday morning, just before leaving Washington to tour tornado damage in Alabama, gave the final order for special forces and C.I.A. operatives to strike.

Mr. Obama called it a “targeted operation,” although officials said one helicopter was lost because of a mechanical failure and had to be destroyed to keep it from falling into hostile hands.

In addition to Bin Laden, three men were killed during the 40-minute raid, one believed to be his son and the other two his couriers, according to an American official who briefed reporters under White House ground rules forbidding further identification. A woman was killed when she was used as a shield by a male combatant, the official said, and two others wounded.

“No Americans were harmed,” Mr. Obama said. “They took care to avoid civilian casualties. After a firefight, they killed Osama bin Laden and took custody of his body.” Muslim tradition requires burial within 24 hours, but by doing it at sea, American authorities presumably were trying to avoid creating a shrine for his followers.

The fate of Ayman al-Zawahiri, the Al Qaeda second-in-command, was unclear Sunday night.

Bin Laden’s death came nearly 10 years after Al Qaeda terrorists hijacked four American passenger jets, crashing three of them into the World Trade Center in New York and the Pentagon outside Washington. The fourth hijacked jet, United Flight 93, crashed into the Pennsylvania countryside after passengers fought the militants.

“This is important news for us, and for the world,” said Gordon Felt, president of the group Families of Flight 93. “It cannot ease our pain, or bring back our loved ones. It does bring a measure of comfort that the mastermind of the September 11th tragedy and the face of global terror can no longer spread his evil.”

The mostly young people who celebrated in the streets of New York and Washington saw it as a historic moment, one that for many of them culminated a worldwide manhunt that started when they were children.

Some climbed trees and lampposts directly in front of the White House to cheer and wave flags. Cigars and noisemakers were common. One group started singing, “Osama, Osama, hey, hey, hey, goodbye.”

Maureen Hasson, 22, a recent college graduate working for the Justice Department, came down to Lafayette Square in a fuchsia party dress and flip-flops. “This is full circle for our generation,” she said. “Just look around at the average age here. We were all in middle school when the terrorists struck. We all vividly remember 9/11 and this is the close of that chapter.”

Sam Sherman, 18, a freshman at George Washington University originally from New York, also rushed down to the White House. “The feeling you can’t even imagine, the feeling in the air. It’s crazy,” he said. “I have friends with parents dead because of Osama bin Laden’s plan, O.K.? So when I heard this news, I was coming down to celebrate.”

Mr. Obama said Pakistan had helped develop the intelligence that led to Bin Laden, but an American official said the Pakistani government was not informed about the strike in advance. “We shared our intelligence on this compound with no other country, including Pakistan,” the official said.

Mr. Obama recalled his statements in the 2008 presidential campaign when he vowed to order American forces to strike inside Pakistan if necessary even without Islamabad’s permission. “That is what we’ve done,” he said. “But it’s important to note that our counterterrorism cooperation with Pakistan helped lead us to Bin Laden and the compound where he was hiding.”

Relations with Pakistan had fallen in recent weeks to their lowest point in years. Adm. Mike Mullen, the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, publicly criticized the Pakistani military two weeks ago for failing to act against extremists allied to Al Qaeda who shelter in the tribal areas of North Waziristan. Last week, Gen. Ashfaq Parvez Kayani, head of the Pakistani Army, said Pakistan had broken the back of terrorism on its territory, prompting skepticism in Washington.

Mr. Obama called President Asif Ali Zardari of Pakistan to tell him about the strike after it was set in motion, and his advisers called their Pakistani counterparts. “They agree that this is a good and historic day for both of our nations,” Mr. Obama said.

The city of Abbottabad where Bin Laden was found has had other known Al Qaeda presence in the past. A senior Indonesian militant, Umar Patek, was arrested there earlier this year. Mr. Patek was protected by a Qaeda operative, a clerk who worked undercover at the main post office, a signal that Al Qaeda may have had other operations in the area.

As the operation’s start approached, many American officials at the United States consulate in Peshawar, the capital of the northwest area of Pakistan, were told suddenly to depart last Friday, leaving behind only a core group of essential staff. The American officials said they had been told to leave because of fears of kidnapping but were not tipped off to the operation.

Analysts said Bin Laden’s death amounted to a double blow for Al Qaeda, after its sermons of anti-Western violence seemed to be rendered irrelevant by the wave of political upheaval rolling through the Arab world.

“It comes at a time when Al Qaeda’s narrative is already very much in doubt in the Arab world,” said Martin S. Indyk, vice president and director of foreign policy at the Brookings Institution. “Its narrative was that violence was the way to redeem Arab honor and dignity. But Osama bin Laden and his violence didn’t succeed in unseating anybody.”

Al Qaeda sympathizers reacted with disbelief, anger and in some cases talk of retribution. On a Web site considered an outlet for Al Qaeda messages, forum administrators deleted posts by users announcing Bin Laden’s death and demanded that members wait until the news was confirmed by Al Qaeda sources, according to the SITE Intelligence Group, an organization that monitors radicals.

Even so, SITE said, sympathizers on the forum posted messages calling Bin Laden a martyr and suggesting retaliation. “America will reap the same if the news is true and false,” said one message. “The lions will remain lions and will continue moving in the footsteps of Usama,” said another, using an alternate spelling of Bin Laden’s name.

In the United States, the Council on American-Islamic Relations, an advocacy organization, said it welcomed Bin Laden’s death. “As we have stated repeatedly since the 9/11 terror attacks, Bin Laden never represented Muslims or Islam,” the group said in a statement. “In fact, in addition to the killing of thousands of Americans, he and Al Qaeda caused the deaths of countless Muslims worldwide.”

Mr. Obama called to inform his predecessor, George W. Bush, who first launched the war against Al Qaeda after Sept. 11, yet was frustrated in his efforts to capture Bin Laden “dead or alive,” as he once put it. “This momentous achievement marks a victory for America, for people who seek peace around the world, and for all those who lost loved ones on September 11, 2001,” Mr. Bush said in a statement. “The fight against terror goes on, but tonight America has sent an unmistakable message: No matter how long it takes, justice will be done.”

President Obama used similar language and warned that the war against terrorists had not ended. “We will be relentless in defense of our citizens and our friends and allies. We will be true to the values that make us who we are. And on nights like this one, we can say to those families who have lost loved ones to Al Qaeda’s terror, justice has been done.”

The president was careful to add that, as Mr. Bush did during his presidency, the United States is not at war with Islam. “Bin Laden was not a Muslim leader; he was a mass murderer of Muslims,” Mr. Obama said. “Indeed, Al Qaeda has slaughtered scores of Muslims in many countries, including our own. So his demise should be welcomed by all who believe in peace and human dignity.”


READ MORE -

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

The troubling specter of NII

Government should have acted immediately when the public anxious to face the people who deceive under the guise of religion. Lunge kick the so-called Islamic State of Indonesia dream which has already claimed many victims. But strangely, the Police of the Republic of Indonesia as though unable to dismantle this network and capture the mastermind.

It is not enough officials said the issue is being researched or investigated. The public also will not be satisfied with such a normative statement submitted by the Coordinating Minister for Political, Legal and Security Djoko Suyanto. Yesterday, Minister only asked all parties involved be aware of the elements that encourage doing evil and establish an Islamic state.

The attitude of the government was not able to calm the public. See only happens on college campuses. The president is busy coordinating with police to counter guerrilla NII. Even some universities have established crisis centers to receive reports that may be missing student was recruited by the NII.

Public panic triggered by the victim NII really exist. Victims generally experience indoctrination, there is a call by the term brainwashing. After successfully influenced the mind, the victim said yes what was ordered. They claim could not refuse when asked to deposit some money.

Recently, a candidate for civil servants also had disappeared, and was found in a state of instability. The same thing happened to a number of students in Malang and Yogyakarta. All allegedly influenced by people who claim the NII, then dibaiat to become a member of this organization. A research institute NII even mention the number of followers in the hundreds of thousands and scattered in various provinces.

If the allegations were true, lunge kick NII certainly very dangerous. Not only deceive the public, they also act treason because of trying to establish an Islamic state. But the public becomes confused because the government officials seem not to panic. They did not exert any force to disassemble, and capturing the driving.

Some people often associate it with the group's activities NII Pesantren Al-Zaytun leader in Indramayu, West Java. But Panji Gumilang, this figure, has repeatedly denied this too. Modern pesantren activities that have thousands of students are also normal. Panji was never touched by the police, and was often visited pesantren political figures.

So who actually drive the NII. This is the conundrum that many years unanswered. There was this group is accusing the intelligence project for cornering Islam as happened in the New Order. But such allegations have been denied by officials yesterday the state, including military officers.

There's no other way, completely revealing the strange activity is the only way to reassure the public. Without this effort, the government is tantamount to letting the public in a state of restless, confused, and full of prejudice.

Repost edisi Indonesia_
http://www.tempointeraktif.com/hg/opiniKT/2011/04/29/krn.20110429.234459.id.html

READ MORE -

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

THE NEGATIVE Effects of Facebook

What was once a website created exclusively for students of Harvard University has become the ultimate social staple of our era. Facebook has come so far that it is rare to meet anyone these days who has not succumbed to making their own profile. While there are obvious benefits to the ease of communication Facebook provides, it is important to take into consideration that this kind of fingertip access to just about anyone has its downsides as wel

It is common to hear people who use Facebook on a daily basis refer to it as “addictive” because of a seemingly compulsive need to check the page for updates, or update their own status several times a day. Because Facebook is so accessible now that it is available on most mobile phones in addition to computers, status messages become a sort of a running diary of events in a person's life, and many users will post the kind of information that would normally be reserved for a close friend or confidant on their pages.

Every time a person logs on there are likely to be several new posts giving insight, sometimes very personal, into the lives of their friends, and this appeals to the voyeur in most people, making them want to check over and over again for the latest news and gossip.

Facebook profiles, in general, are created under a person's real name. This means that anyone who knows a person's full name can find their Facebook page with relative ease. Because of the current popularity of the site, the assumption that almost everyone has a page has lead everyone from exes, to concerned parents, to stalkers, to employers to search and find the profiles of specific people. While it is possible to make your page private for anyone who is not on your friends list, that cheesy picture of you chugging a beer with your arm around your married co-worker will show up by default, as will your location or school.

Also, take into consideration that not everyone on your friends list might be who they say they are. People who intend to find out information about you can take many forms, and the smartest way to do so would be to take the appearance of a friend. Just keep in mind that if you wouldn't want your boss, your mother, or a potential stalker to see something, it is probably best not to put it on any part of your Facebook page.

Social networking sites have become invaluable for instant and fun communication with everyone from neighbors and friends to family living overseas. While enjoying the ease with which we can keep up with our Facebook friends, it is important to also keep in mind not to let it become a compulsion that will keep us from productive or more personally rewarding activities. We also need to remember that while our page might seem private, it is on the internet and nothing on the internet is truly secure from public view. It is common for daily users of Facebook to say they have a “love-hate” relationship with the site, and if we consider the downfalls of it as well as the benefits, it is possible to have a safe and enjoyable experience using social networking at its finest.


*http://www.helium.com/items/1785979-the-negative-side-of-facebook

READ MORE -

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

Royal Wedding Weight Watch: Wispy Kate Middleton Spotlights 'Brideorexia'

If the popularity of bridal "boot camps" and shows like Shedding for the Wedding are any indication, losing weight for the wedding day ranks high on women's lists of pre-nuptial tasks. So much so that the term brideorexia (a reference to the potentially fatal eating disorder anorexia) has entered the lexicon. But are women really taking their bridal diets to that extreme?

It's true that many brides-to-be try to shed unreasonably large amounts of weight. In a 2000 Cornell study of 273 women who were getting married within the year, 70% of respondents reported wanting to lose more than 20 lb. But in reality, by wedding day, their average weight loss was 7 lb.

"Clearly we live in a culture that values thinness, and this is probably the event of most women's lives that puts the brightest spotlight on them," says Dr. Jeffrey Sobal, a co-author of the study and a professor of sociology at Cornell. "But for most, the methods [the women reported] were fairly benign: they did more exercise, increased fruits and vegetables, used weights. My projection is that it really isn't a problem except in a few extreme cases."

"Does Extremely Picky Eating in Adulthood Signal a Mental Disorder?"
What about those extremes? Sobal says a minority of women in his study — fewer than 10 — engaged in unhealthy weight-loss behavior like taking laxatives, using liquid diets, smoking to suppress appetite and over-restricting calories. But it's possible that the changing landscape of the wedding industry has resulted in an increase in extreme cases over the years.

"In the 1990s, there were relatively few entrepreneurial pushes to get women to lose weight. Of all the wedding magazines we could get our hands on, we only found one weight-loss ad," says Sobal. "That's changed since 2000. Now there's bridal boot camp, extreme makeovers, and they encourage bridal weight loss. There's a little more pressure by profitmaking groups and competition emphasis on thinness in the bridal community."

Worse, the media continues to celebrate the image of a svelte bride: the British tabloids have been making a fuss over how much Kate Middleton's 5-ft. 10-in. frame has whittled down since the 29-year-old made her first official appearance as Prince William's fiancée on Feb. 24. It does appear that Middleton has shrunk from a reported U.K. size 10 (size 6 in the U.S.) to a tiny U.K. size 6 (U.S. size 2), but whether she has developed a case of brideorexia is unclear.

"Kate Middleton's Secret Confirmation"
Certainly, if Middleton were suffering from anorexia nervosa — a serious psychological condition that kills 10% to 20% of patients — or some other eating disorder, the media scrutiny of her pre-wedding figure probably wouldn't be helping. What's more, it could be a trigger for the 1% of the U.S. population who do have anorexia, according to Dr. Ira M. Sacker, an eating-disorder specialist and associate professor of pediatrics at NYU-Langone Medical Center.

"Numbers are triggers," says Sacker. "People who are on the verge of an eating disorder are people who are body-image conscious, who might say, 'If she can do it, I can do it.' When major figures lose weight, there's a social copycat effect that's real."

And for a minority of brides, a short-term extreme-weight-loss regimen can turn into a chronic problem. According to Sacker, who has seen an escalation in "brideorexic" behavior over the past decade, about 10% of women who start risky pre-wedding diet and exercise programs will develop a lasting disorder. Such women, who are often already predisposed to developing an eating disorder, may be pushed over the edge by the stress of their impending wedding day, Sacker says.

"Family-Focused Therapy Works Better for Teens with Eating Disorders"
Who's at risk? Women with a lifelong preoccupation with body image, a perfectionist streak or a previous diagnosis of obsessive-compulsive disorder. Women who have recovered from eating disorders in the past are also at greater risk. Sacker has treated brides who have abused stimulants or laxatives to lose weight, exercised compulsively or developed disordered eating, such as drastically restricting their food intake or eating food in a ritualistic way. Some women may also engage in disordered thinking, becoming preoccupied with a specific body part or obsessively measuring themselves.

What differentiates these behaviors from simple short-term crash dieting — which is also not healthy — is that they can snowball in vulnerable women and result in full-blown chronic illness. Worse, dramatic weight loss and malnutrition can reduce levels of serotonin in the brain, a neurotransmitter that contributes to feelings of happiness and well-being, while increasing levels of other chemicals that increase stress. The result may be depression and social withdrawal, which can trigger a feedback loop of destructive behavior in vulnerable women.

"There's nothing wrong with losing weight," says Sacker. "Brides are going to do that. To try and change that is ridiculous. But if it's an extreme issue — if we're using restriction, diuretics, stimulants and other risk-taking behavior — they should know there are rebound effects."

"Ten Wedding Dresses Fit for a Princess"
If you're worried that a friend may be at risk of taking her wedding diet too far, Sacker suggests looking out for certain red flags:

1. Changes in food-related behavior: Does she avoid social situations that involve food? Does she play with her meal instead of eating it? Has she turned eating into a ritual — eating the exact same thing each day or refusing to eat outside of a rigid schedule?

2. Extreme calorie shedding: Is she suddenly exercising more than 30 to 45 minutes a day? Does she run to the bathroom after a meal?

3. Changes in mood: Has she become depressed, irritable, apathetic or agitated?

4. Social isolation: Is your friend withdrawing socially? She may seem more self-involved, introspective and spacey.

5. Extreme weight loss: Abnormal thinness is an obvious sign, as well as fatigue, dizziness or fainting, dry skin and brittle nails.


*Read more:
http://healthland.time.com/2011/04/18/royal-wedding-weight-watch-wispy-kate-middleton-spotlights-brideorexia/?iid=WBeditorspicks

READ MORE -

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS

KPK under attack

With the war on terrorism far from over, Indonesia has seen mounting attacks on corruption fighters, despite the nationwide acceptance that graft is an extraordinary crime, separate from terrorism. A plan by the House of Representatives to revise Law No. 30/2002 on the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) is widely seen as the latest foray intended to weaken the anti-corruption drive.

Sadly, the penchant behind the amendment comes against the backdrop of the prosecution of 25 active and former House politicians implicated in alleged bribery that marred the election of Bank Indonesia (BI) senior deputy governor Miranda Swaray Goeltom in 2004.

Since its inception in 2003, the KPK has altogether prosecuted 42 House politicians involved in eight corruption cases, not to mention high-profile state officials ranging from BI executives to election commissioners.

People with common sense will easily smell the conflict of interest in the House’s move to change the law, which clearly is aimed at downgrading corruption as an ordinary crime and the anti graft body as a regular corruption buster.

Indonesia Corruption Watch (ICW) has revealed 13 attempts to undermine KPK orchestrated by lawmakers through judicial reviews of the KPK law, which the House itself had approved, and attacks on individual KPK leaders. The latest failed judicial review motion was filed by Golkar politician Hengky Baramuli, one of 25 people named as a suspect in the bribery case related to Miranda’s election.

Among the crucial amendments sought by the politicians are curbs on KPK authorities that they say overlap those of other state institutions, including the right to wiretap people and officials thought to be involved in corruption. Major graft cases have been unveiled after KPK investigators tapped the mobile phones of certain people.

The revision is also focused on the KPK’s zero tolerance on halting investigations, which has so far been key to the commission’s unbeaten run in its battle against corruption. As the existing law does not allow it to give up cases, the KPK will never launch an investigation with neither solid evidence nor confidence the court verdicts go in its favor.

Lawmakers have questioned this policy, as it contradicts the country’s non-discriminative principle of law enforcement. Other law enforcement agencies — the Attorney General’s Office and the National Police — have no hesitation in dropping investigations based on lack of evidence, but this has given room for negotiations that have helped breed corruption and transactional politics.

The KPK arrived just in time — when public faith in state prosecutors and the police was waning. Public confidence in these institutions has certainly remained low, but the KPK has at times provided glimmers of hope for the country’s efforts to cut the cycle of corruption associated with former administrations. The KPK’s presence is justified by the fact that corruption is putting Indonesia’s democracy at risk, as in the case of vote buying practices in regional or national elections.

Several times the KPK has revealed acts of bribery influencing the decisions made by government officials and lawmakers and it’s only about time that the anti-graft commission disclose high-level political processes, such as bribes related to the House endorsement of certain bills — a fact of life in Indonesia that many have sensed but have found difficult to prove.

There is no action other than rhetoric from the government of President Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono to protect the KPK from potential political harassment.

Acts of terrorism have killed hundreds, but corruption will be responsible for the deaths of millions.


*http://www.thejakartapost.com/news/2011/04/26/kpk-under-attack.html
READ MORE -

  • Digg
  • Del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Reddit
  • RSS